Hello There, Guest!

13-05-2012, 04:54 PM | Post: #61
azamath123 
Please change the playername togf behind SimonFlowers to Azamath123 because thats the playername of the account im playing with :>

[Image: firmabro.png]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
13-05-2012, 05:08 PM | Post: #62
podium123456 
(13-05-2012 04:33 PM)The_WUUSTER Wrote:  As for map choices, if we're using vehicles we have to limit the tank/plane use (b/c frankly that guy spamming planes the 1st round of BB was not that fun).

How do you feel about getting rid of vehicles altogether, and just having infantry maps? Im thinking about doing that... making it VV and CC, with RR tiebreaker.

(13-05-2012 04:54 PM)azamath123 Wrote:  Please change the playername togf behind SimonFlowers to Azamath123 because thats the playername of the account im playing with :>

Will do.

[Image: JYoQBAB.png]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
13-05-2012, 05:11 PM | Post: #63
Drew 
You should play VV, RR and AA for a tie-break.
(Nationals apparently win lots on VV, Royals win lots on RR and everybody hates AA, but it has 1 tank per team and no planes lol)

Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
13-05-2012, 05:24 PM | Post: #64
The_WUUSTER 
^No AA pl0x

And yes infantry only.

[Image: wuuster.png]
(23-12-2012 06:57 AM)TPangolin Wrote:  I've always enjoyed reading your posts.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
13-05-2012, 05:26 PM | Post: #65
Samu. 
We should so play seaside skirmish:3

Todaygiven
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
13-05-2012, 05:29 PM | Post: #66
Fearless-Death 
(13-05-2012 05:26 PM)samuraiwarior1 Wrote:  We should so play seaside skirmish:3

The map? I heard there are immortal demons hiding in the tanks that have 974124789127498127489127489124789147189 wrenches.

[Image: UQ7iX.png]

One PM, to rule them all

Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
13-05-2012, 05:49 PM | Post: #67
Wynhead 
2 late...

Im a sad panda Sad

Good luck though!

[Image: th_Popcorn-02-Stephen-Colbertsmall.gif]
EA Support (Billing Link) Click!
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
13-05-2012, 05:51 PM | Post: #68
podium123456 
(13-05-2012 05:11 PM)Drew Wrote:  You should play VV, RR and AA for a tie-break.
(Nationals apparently win lots on VV, Royals win lots on RR and everybody hates AA, but it has 1 tank per team and no planes lol)

lol @ 'everybody hates AA' Big Grin

(13-05-2012 05:26 PM)samuraiwarior1 Wrote:  We should so play seaside skirmish:3

Troll. Tongue

(i've always kinda liked that map tho... dont tell anybody. Confused)

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

K im getting rid of the vehicle map. Im going with VV and CC, RR tiebreak. It can change if majority wants something else.

Would like a few more opinions on whether or not there should be mandos.

Also, teamspeak is not going to be allowed.

[Image: JYoQBAB.png]
(This post was last modified: 13-05-2012 05:53 PM by podium123456.)
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
13-05-2012, 06:00 PM | Post: #69
DarkoL 
Disallow commandos, allow proper communication. There isn't really a point of playing without the ability to communicate, that, and also you can't really know whether the teams are being instinctively cooperative or are using ts/vent/etc like what happened with OB from CB's point of view.

I would apply but I haven't played in a very long time and I suck anyway + I never have less than 180 - 190ms ping on EU servers, so I don't really fit for a 'hardcore' match.

[Image: 16979_s.gif]

Signatures by Andyx7 and Gorjay. <3


Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
13-05-2012, 06:00 PM | Post: #70
Indignant 
.....
(This post was last modified: 24-07-2013 12:58 AM by Indignant.)
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
13-05-2012, 06:14 PM | Post: #71
Harlinger 
(13-05-2012 03:56 PM)podium123456 Wrote:  
(13-05-2012 03:37 PM)Harlinger Wrote:  Nope, on the exact same day, same hour, just to annoy you. You shouldn't have picked the fatties for OB then.

It wouldn't annoy me, it would just make you look a little childish.

Have fun with it, if you do! Smile

Everything is permitted in order to weaken the royalrace.

Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
13-05-2012, 07:19 PM | Post: #72
Notyou 
Oh, Harlinger, so naive.
Your so called superior race, the Nationals, wouldn't be able to exist if it wasn't for Royals and vice versa.

Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
13-05-2012, 07:26 PM | Post: #73
billijean 
go ob's Smile)

Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
13-05-2012, 07:35 PM | Post: #74
Samu. 
(13-05-2012 07:19 PM)Notyou Wrote:  Oh, Harlinger, so naive.
Your so called superior race, the Nationals, wouldn't be able to exist if it wasn't for Royals and vice versa.

No they would and they would also have more food. But than we'll turn fat like royals oh awesome.

Todaygiven
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
13-05-2012, 07:36 PM | Post: #75
Sevv14 
I'm in.

[Image: 2znv5mx.png]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
13-05-2012, 07:38 PM | Post: #76
Samu. 
^
Which class?

Todaygiven
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
13-05-2012, 07:50 PM | Post: #77
DopeMuch? 
Second time that OB plays as Royals...

[Image: 2qxonit.png]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
13-05-2012, 07:51 PM | Post: #78
Samu. 
Well my thread is supposedly gonna host another match which will be pretty much the same as the last one although nats are the OBs now and CBs are royals.

Todaygiven
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
13-05-2012, 07:52 PM | Post: #79
Drugie 
I would sign up, but I've only played for a couple hours over the last month, so I don't think playing in a "hardcore" match is the best idea.

(06-06-2012 02:32 PM)The_WUUSTER Wrote:  Then I'm putting it in.

What happens in BF:H stays in BF:H

Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
13-05-2012, 07:58 PM | Post: #80
podium123456 
(13-05-2012 06:00 PM)Darkol Wrote:  Disallow commandos, allow proper communication. There isn't really a point of playing without the ability to communicate, that, and also you can't really know whether the teams are being instinctively cooperative or are using ts/vent/etc like what happened with OB from CB's point of view.

OK, sounds like most people are ok with no mandos. Sounds good to me. 3 soldiers, 3 gunners. this should make samauraiwarrior happy. Big Grin

For the teamspeak... i dunno... i think i might still not allow it. It will make things more even, in case one team has more access to voicechat than the other. We will go by the honor system, as far as the issue of not being able to tell if someone is using it or not.

(13-05-2012 06:00 PM)Darkol Wrote:  I would apply but I haven't played in a very long time and I suck anyway + I never have less than 180 - 190ms ping on EU servers, so I don't really fit for a 'hardcore' match.

You should play man! I think it's going to end up on a US server, anyway.


(13-05-2012 06:00 PM)Indignant Wrote:  I'll play as commando for closed beta.

If proof is needed that I played then, I'll send it in a PM to the organizer.

Mandos are out now... but you can play on your soldier. Want to do that?

BTW, wouldn't the CB tag automatically show on your account? Or are you saying you played on another account during CB?

(13-05-2012 07:36 PM)Sevv14 Wrote:  I'm in.

All OB slots are full. I will put you in the first reserve slot, as a soldier/gunner if you want. Let me know if you want on the reserve list.

(13-05-2012 07:52 PM)Drugie Wrote:  I would sign up, but I've only played for a couple hours over the last month, so I don't think playing in a "hardcore" match is the best idea.

LOOK EVERYBODY... HE SCURRED! Tongue

You'll probably be fine, if you want to play. Just let me know.

[Image: JYoQBAB.png]
(This post was last modified: 13-05-2012 07:59 PM by podium123456.)
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply




Forum Jump:



X
Add this person to your friends list
Remove this person from your friends list
/en/ajax/checkFriendStatus
/en/ajax/friend